Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brooks v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 21, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

A motion has been made by the appellee to dismiss this appeal on the grounds that the appeal was ndt taken within sixty days counting from the ruling of the court on the demurrer, and that “if the appeal is intended' to be from the judgment of March 31st, 19-24, the record shows that this judgment was for costs following the judgment sustaining a demurrer, .and that such- appeal is without merit.” It is too late to question that the time for the appeal is counted from the judgment on the demurrer, and not from the ruling of the court; and that the judgment on demurrer was an adverse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lammon v. FeusierSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Dashiell v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Cocking v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  4. State Ex Rel. Southern Maryland National Bank v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. Mitchell v. LemonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Landwehr v. Continental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  3. State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Hill v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API