Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Southern Maryland National Bank v. National Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 13, 1915PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charles County. (Beall and Camalier, JJ.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
The General Assembly of 1908, p. 252, by Ch. Ill, repealed and re-enacted with amendments sec. 32-D of the laws relating to public roads in this State. Among the provisions as thus adopted was the following:
“In all cases where the contract for work and materials shall be given out after competitive bidding, the successful bidder shall promptly execute a formal contract to be approved as to its form, terms and conditions by said Commission, and shall also execute and deliver to said Commission a good and sufficient bond to be approved by said Commission to the State of Maryland in not less…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mankin v. United States Ex Rel. Ludowici-Celadon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Aetna Indemnity, Co. v. John WatersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- State, Use of Smith v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Conesco Industries, Ltd. A New Jersey Corporation v. Conforti and Eisele, Inc., D. C. A District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. W. & J. Knox Net & Twine Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- City of Montpelier v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.