Legal Opinion

Lammon v. Feusier

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 17, 1884No. 192PublishedCited by 96 opinions

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA. The original action was brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nevada, by Henry Feusier, a citizen of California, against George I. Lammon and three other persons, citizens of Nevada, upon a bond given by Lammon, the marshal of the United States for that district, as principal, and by the other defendants as his sureties, and conditioned that Lammon, “ by himself and…

Read the full summary

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA. The original action was brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nevada, by Henry Feusier, a citizen of California, against George I. Lammon and three other persons, citizens of Nevada, upon a bond given by Lammon, the marshal of the United States for that district, as principal, and by the other defendants as his sureties, and conditioned that Lammon, “ by himself and by his deputies, shall faithfully perform all the duties of the said office of marshal.” It was alleged in the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

After, reciting the foregoing facts, he continued:

The bond sued on- was given under § 783 of the Revised Statutes, which requires every marshal, before entering on the duties of his office, to give bond with sureties for the faithful performance of those duties by himself and his deputies; and this action was brought under § 781, which authorizes any person, injured by a breach of the condition of the bond, to sue thereon in his own name and for his sole use.

The question presented by the record is, whether the taking by the.marshal upon a Writ of attachment on mesne process against one…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. People Ex Rel. Kellogg v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Cumming v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Andrew Powe v. The City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Hall v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Gumbel v. PitkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API