Legal Opinion

Dashiell v. Griffith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 3, 1896PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. At the trial the plaintiff offered the following prayers : Plaintiff's 1st Prayer.—If the jury find from the evidence that the defendant was a physician and surgeon, and, as such, undertook to treat the plaintiff, Caroline Griffith, for a disease of her finger, and entered upon said treatment; that said finger was subsequently amputated, and that said amputation was rendered necessary by the want of such reasonable skill, care and…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. At the trial the plaintiff offered the following prayers : Plaintiff's 1st Prayer.—If the jury find from the evidence that the defendant was a physician and surgeon, and, as such, undertook to treat the plaintiff, Caroline Griffith, for a disease of her finger, and entered upon said treatment; that said finger was subsequently amputated, and that said amputation was rendered necessary by the want of such reasonable skill, care and diligence in the treatment of said finger and of the said plaintiff, as is usually exercised by physicians and surgeons in…

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This appeal is from the judgment of the Baltimore City Court. The facts are, that Mrs. Griffith, one of the plaintiffs and wife 'of the other, was suffering from a disease commonly known as bone-felon, which was upon the index finger of her right hand. - She visited the office of the defendant, a practicing physician, for the purpose of obtaining his professional assistance; he gave the plaintiff medical attention as hereinafter' stated; this action is brought by plaintiffs, jointly as husband and wife, to recover damages for the alleged negligence of'the defendant in the treatment of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Long v. MorrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Lawson v. ConawayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Smothers v. HanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Patten v. WigginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1862

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Shilkret v. Annapolis Emergency Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Radman v. HaroldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Nolan v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. GendaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API