Legal Opinion

State v. Little

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 24, 1929No. [No. 27, April Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtUbneb, J.

The official bond given by the clerk of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, under statutory direction, for the biennial period beginning December 1st, 1923, was conditioned upon the faithful performance of all the duties required of him by law. An alleged breach of his duty to index an instrument in accordance with legal requirements is the basis of this suit on the bond.

■ The amended declaration averred that one of the defendant clerk’s duties was to index all conveyances recorded among the Land Records of Baltimore City in a system of land indexes known as the Block Index System, adopted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Southern Maryland National Bank v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  2. State, Use of Smith v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Temple v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Silberstein v. Baltimore County BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API