Legal Opinion
People v. Hartley
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1961No. Crim. 3842PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.
Defendants Hartley, Willis and Smith, convicted of robbery in the first degree and rape in four counts, appeal from the judgment.
Defendant Smith, convicted of violating section 288a of the Penal Code, also appeals from that judgment.
The record shows that on October 26,1959, at approximately 4:45 a. m., Daniel Roosendahl and Carmen Simpson drove to Coit Tower on Roosendahl's motor scooter. After they had been there about 15 minutes, another car drove up, and four Negro men got out. One of these men asked Mrs. Simpson for money. When she told him that she had no money, he said, “Let me see,”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. ArrangoizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- People v. DarmientoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966