State v. Barber
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in admitting the confession of the defendant.. When the defendant objected to the testimony relating to the inculpatory statements purportedly made by him, the trial judge properly held a voir dire hearing to determine whether the statements were in fact voluntarily and understandingly made. State v. Hill, 276 N.C. 1, 170 S.E. 2d 885; State v. Wright, 275 N.C. 242, 166 S.E. 2d 681; State v. Conyers, 267 N.C. 618, 148 S.E. 2d 569; State v. Rogers, 233 N.C. 390, 64 S.E. 2d 572, 28 A.L.R. 2d 1104. Both the defendant and the State…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. SweezySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.