People v. White
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
. FRIEDMAN,
Following a proceeding before a committing magistrate, defendant was bound over to the superior court for trial on a charge of second degree burglary. An information was filed. Being at liberty on bail, he appeared before the superior court for arraignment at 10 o’clock on a particular morning. The court told Mm that he was entitled to an attorney and that if he had no funds of his own the court would employ an attorney for him. Defendant responded that he did not wish an attorney and stated, “I want to plead guilty and have a trial now. ’ ’ He was told that if he pleaded guilty no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- In Re Van BruntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. ColeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- In Re KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.