Legal Opinion
In Re Kelly
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 1966No. Crim. 4031PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Habeas corpus, attacking a 1960 conviction of escape from state prison (in violation of Penal Code section 4530). Petitioner is also held under earlier commitments for offenses such as bad checks, burglary and forgery.
Like the applicants in In re Van Brunt (3 Crim. 3996, 4003) ante, p. 96 [51 Cal.Rptr. 136], and In re Grayson (3 Crim. 4016) ante, p. 110 [51 Cal.Rptr. 145], this day filed, petitioner appeared before a magistrate and made a courtroom confession which served as the basis of his commitment to the superior court. He contends that he was inadequately advised of his right to counsel…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. DouglasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. SantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. BatistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- In Re VizzardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.