Legal Opinion

In Re Van Brunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1966No. Crim. 3996, 4003PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Kenneth Van Brunt and Hugh Vizzard were committed to state prison in 1958 following their pleas of guilty to an armed robbery. In petitions for habeas corpus they attack their convictions, alleging primarily deprivation of their constitutional right to representation by legal counsel. A related issue is raised by the contention that at their preliminary examination the committing magistrate effectually deprived them of the protection of article I, section 8, of the California Constitution and Penal Code section 859a, which prevent a felony defendant from pleading guilty at his preliminary…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. BourlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. BourlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API