Legal Opinion

People v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1964No. Crim. 4412, 4413PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

On this appeal from a conviction for possession of forged checks for payment of money (Pen. Code, § 475), and conspiracy to commit forgery (Pen. Code, §§ 182 and 470), the main question presented is whether defendant’s right to counsel has been infringed upon. For the reasons that follow, we have concluded that defendant suffered an improper deprivation of counsel and that therefore the judgments appealed from must he reversed. Accordingly, we see no reason to discuss defendant’s remaining contention that the trial court denied him due process in refusing to subpoena witnesses.

Defendant’s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. PreslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. In Re Van BruntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API