Legal Opinion
International Salt Co. v. Geostow
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 12, 1988No. Civ. 87-1501LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
This is a diversity action brought pursuant to Article 15 of the New York Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law to quiet title. In Count 1 of its complaint, the plaintiff seeks a declaration from this court, pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and Article 15 of the New York Real Property and Proceedings Law, of its rights under certain deeds to the use and ownership of the mining or containing chamber created by its salt mining operation in Retsof, New York.
The only matter before the court is plaintiff’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Integrated Waste Services, Inc., and Bear Development Company, Inc. v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc., F/k/a Akzo Salt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- International Salt Co. v. GeostowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Integrated Waste Services, Inc. v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- International Salt Company v. GeostowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989