Legal Opinion

Integrated Waste Services, Inc. v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 16, 1996No. 6:95-cv-06247PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

This is a diversity action brought by Integrated Waste Services, Inc. (“IWS”) and Bear Development Company, Inc. (“Bear”) against Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc. (“Akzo”). Plaintiffs assert claims for negligence, strict liability for conducting an abnormally dangerous activity, nuisance, and trespass, all in connection with certain salt-mining activities undertaken by Akzo. Akzo has^ moved for summary judgment. s

BACKGROUND

The parties in the instant case were\lso parties, or are the successors to parties, in a prior case before this court, International Salt Co. v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Johnson v. Jamaica HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Doundoulakis v. Town of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Integrated Waste Services, Inc., and Bear Development Company, Inc. v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc., F/k/a Akzo Salt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API