Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1993No. Civ. 930116PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

We are asked to decide, for purposes of driving under the influence and actual physical control cases, if the State Toxicologist must certify the blood testing equipment in his laboratory is “in good working order.” We conclude such specific certification is not required to establish foundation for admission of blood test results.

The Director of the Department of Transportation suspended Dwight Erickson’s driving privileges for being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. The district court reversed holding the Director’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schwind v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. VandeHovenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. SalhusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hammeren v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. JordheimNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zimmerman v. North Dakota Department of Transportation DirectorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Aamodt v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kahl v. DIRECTOR, NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. AsbridgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API