Legal Opinion

Thurmond v. Compaq Computer Corp.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided October 18, 2000No. 1:99CV711PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPECIAL MASTER

RADFORD, United States Magistrate Judge.

Representative Plaintiffs filed a class action suit against the Defendant, Compaq Computer Corporation in October, 1999. Thus, began a hard-fought paper war that has subsided for the most part. This opinion addresses one of the more distasteful incidents arising during that conflict.

Long ago, Plaintiffs attempted to notice the deposition of Compaq employees, including Lewis Newcomb, the manager of an engineering group in the Houston office. Since the Defendant had…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Navigant Consulting, Inc. v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
  2. In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated March 24, 2003 Directed to (A) Grand Jury Witness Firm and (B) Grand Jury WitnessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Specht v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  4. Kansas Wastewater, Inc. v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  5. Myers v. City of Highland VillageDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API