Legal Opinion
Specht v. Google, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 25, 2010No. 09 C 2572PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant Google’s (hereinafter, “Google”) Motion to Compel and for Sanctions regarding the deposition of Martin Murphy; and Plaintiff Erich Specht’s (hereinafter, “Specht”) Cross-Motion for a Protective Order and for Sanctions. For the reasons stated below, Google’s Motions are granted in part and Specht’s Motions are denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Erich Specht brought this lawsuit for trademark infringement on behalf of himself and two software corporations that he owns—Android Data Corporation and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. BDO Seidman, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- John Powers v. The Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Blanchard v. EdgeMark Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Miyano Machinery USA, Inc. v. Miyanohitec Machinery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Security National Bank v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014
- Charvat v. ValenteDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Ezell v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Johnson v. Statewide Investigative Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- QUICK v. TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.