Legal Opinion

Teledyne Wah Chang v. Vorderstrasse

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 1990No. WCB No. 86-14401; CA A63132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed the referee and concluded that claimant’s occupational disease claim is compensable.1 We reverse and remand.

Claimant injured his right wrist while using a pneumatic grinder at work in 1982. The claim was accepted by employer as nondisabling. In 1983, claimant filed a claim for additional medical services for his right wrist, which employer denied. Claimant then began experiencing left wrist pain, for which he received medical treatment. The parties eventually stipulated that employer would pay for medical…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Finch v. Stayton Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Johnston v. James River Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Collins v. Hygenic Corp. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API