Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Barajas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 1991No. WCB 88-10277; CA A64438PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Summitt Enterprises, employer, seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that held that claimant’s injuries are compensable under ORS dSd.OOñ^Xa). 1 We hold that the order is inadequate for review.

Claimant is a tree planter. Sometime before April 4, 1988, employer transported him and other employees from Medford to California. Claimant’s home was in Medford. He stayed in California in a motel room paid for by employer, which provided transportation from the motel to the work site and back each day of work.

The Board adopted the findings of the referee, of which these are relevant:

“(2)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mellis v. McEWEN, HANNA, GISVOLD, RANKIN & VAN KOTEN, EMPLOYERS, AND MISSION INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Kessen v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Teledyne Wah Chang v. VorderstrasseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Tecorp International, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Redman Industries, Inc. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Tri-Met, Inc. v. OdighizuwaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Irvington Transfer v. JasenoskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Burge v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API