Legal Opinion

Collins v. Hygenic Corp. of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 22, 1987No. WCB 85-00760; CA A39404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed the referee and denied his claim for medical services. We reverse.

Claimant worked as a “snorkel bender.” He sprayed cut plastic tubing with an aerosol lubricant, placed it in a metal mold, put the mold in an oven to bake and subsequently removed the mold from the oven and the tubing, or snorkel, from the mold. He worked on the mezzanine above the first floor of the building. Employer changed the lubricant to a silicone product containing 1,1,1 trichloroethane (3 TCE). Claimant and a co-employe started to use…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finch v. Stayton Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. K-MART v. EvensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Horizon Air Industries, Inc. v. Davis-WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Teledyne Wah Chang v. VorderstrasseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API