Johnston v. James River Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation case, we review under the standards stated in Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988).
The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed the referee on the compensability issue. When the referee makes adequate findings and conclusions of law which the Board either affirms or specifically adopts, it is not necessary for the Board to reiterate those findings in support of its conclusion. See George v. Richard’s Food Center, 90 Or App 639, 752 P2d 1309 (1988). When the Board reverses, adequate judicial review requires specific findings in the Board’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnston v. James River CorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Campos v. Hood River Care CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Teledyne Wah Chang v. VorderstrasseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Benninger v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Erck v. Brown OldsmobileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.