Painter v. Roth
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
The plaintiff, Walter L. Painter, brought an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution against Samuel Roth and David J. Bonwit, co-partners doing business as Palace Credit Clothing Company, and William Alberts. The jury found for the plaintiff against all the defendants. The court below granted motion of Samuel Roth and David J. Bonwit, co-partners doing business as Palace Credit Clothing Company, two of the defendants, for judgment n. o. v. The plaintiff appeals, and assigns as error the granting of said defendants’ motion for judgment n. o. v. The assignment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Randall v. Fenton Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Shields v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carol A. Rannels, Lynn L. Rannels v. S. E. Nichols, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Hornin v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Hubert v. the Alta Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Heisey Et Ux. v. VansantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936