Hornin v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff sued to recover damages for malicious prosecution for which the defendant was allegedly responsible. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff whereon the trial court entered judgment in a reduced amount pursuant to a remittitur filed by the plaintiff in compliance *502with the condition attached to the court’s refusal of the defendant’s motion for a new trial. A motion by the defendant for judgment on a question of law reserved was also denied. From the judgment entered the defendant took the present appeal.
The facts giving rise to the plaintiff’s action…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Poluski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Muehlhof v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Markley v. SnowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Craig ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Kunen v. First Agricultural National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Phillips v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- Carol A. Rannels, Lynn L. Rannels v. S. E. Nichols, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Belmont Industries, Inc. v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.