Legal Opinion

Shields v. Patterson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1929No. Appeal 90PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Two of the three appellant defendants, Patterson Brothers, are partners conducting a dry-goods store in Butler; the third, B. O. Patterson, son of one of the others, is employed by them as credit manager. They appeal from judgment on a verdict in a suit brought by a married woman for malicious prosecution on the charge of larceny by bailee.

In 1919 and 1920, she obtained from Patterson Brothers a lot of household goods (rug's, blankets, pillows, mattress, etc.) priced at $379.46; she paid down $118, and agreed to pay the balance “$10.00 on the pay day of each and every two…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Markley v. SnowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Dunmore v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. McClung v. DearborneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Payne v. East Liberty Spear Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Hayfield v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Painter v. RothSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API