Hubert v. the Alta Life Ins. Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
The action below was in trespass for an alleged malicious prosecution; the second trial of the case resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,500, reduced by remittitur to $2,500; and this appeal is by the defendant insurance company from the judgment entered for the latter amount.
In its assignments appellant complains of the refusal of its point for binding instructions, tbe subsequent denial of its motion for judgment n. o. v., tbe refusal of a new trial, and the entering of judgment upon tbe verdict as reduced. Its contention that its point for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Taylor v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- McClafferty v. PhilpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- MacDonald v. SchroederSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Hugee v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Cohen v. Lit BrothersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- COHEN v. Lit BrothersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- G. A. Nichols Co. v. LockhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.