Legal Opinion

Randall v. Fenton Storage Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1934No. Appeals 424 and 423PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Papke®, J.,

The plaintiff, Margaret Randall, obtained judgments against Fenton Storage Company and Milton B. Seligman in an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, and both defendants have appealed. The assignments of error all complain of the refusal of motions for judgment n. o. v. and the entry of judgments for plaintiff. These assignments raise the sole question involved, which is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdicts.

It is not disputed that Margaret Randall and her mother, Mary Finn, secured from the Fenton Storage Company some second hand…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Taylor v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weiss v. EquibankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Carol A. Rannels, Lynn L. Rannels v. S. E. Nichols, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Stinson v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Hornin v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Payne v. East Liberty Spear Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API