Legal Opinion
Fresno Unified School District v. K.U.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 28, 2013No. Case No. 1:12-cv-01699-MJSPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING COUNTER CLAIMANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND COUNTER CLAIM
MICHAEL J. SENG, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants/Counter Claimants K.U., by and through her mother and educational *1166rights holder, A.D.U., and A.D.U.,1 individually, by their attorney, Roger A. Greenbaum, move to amend and supplement their counter claims. The proposed amended and supplemental counter claims (1) add a claim that the ALJ erred in failing to order Plaintiff Fresno Unified School District to provide Plaintiff with compensatory education; (2) add a claim demanding that Plaintiff amend certain unspecified…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- ecoNugenics, Inc. v. Bioenergy Life Sci., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Alecia Reed-Milton v. California Department of Rehabilitation, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Bollinger v. Starbucks CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Brooke v. Superb Hospitality LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.