Legal Opinion
ecoNugenics, Inc. v. Bioenergy Life Sci., Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 10, 2019No. Case No. 17-cv-5378 (JNE/DTS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID T. SCHULTZ, United States Magistrate Judge *787INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff ecoNugenics, Inc. moves to amend its dismissed patent infringement complaint against Defendant Bioenergy Life Science, Inc. to assert claims of direct infringement. Previously, ecoNugenics alleged inducement to infringe and contributory infringement but did not adequately plead direct infringement by Bioenergy. ecoNugenics now seeks to cure its deficient allegation of direct infringement by making allegations that directly conflict with admissions it made in the original complaint, rendering the proposed amendment futile…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ali v. TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- Bailey v. Metropolitan CouncilDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Benson v. PiperDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Brown v. PfeifferDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- CARBONE v. CARBONE, ESQ.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.