Legal Opinion
Bollinger v. Starbucks Corporation
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 13, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00303Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MARIA BOLLINGER, et al. Case No. 1:24-cv-00303-JLT-SAB 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED 14 v. COMPLAINT 15 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, (ECF Nos. 40, 46, 48) 16 Defendant. THREE AND TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINES 17 18 I. 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiffs Maria Bollinger, Dawn Miller, and Shunda Smith (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 21 initiated this action against Defendant Starbucks Corporation on March 12, 2024. Plaintiffs 22 allege violations of the violation of Title III…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.