Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. McFarland

Opinion by

LOGSDON, 0.

Only two propositions are presented and argued, by plaintiff in its brief, the first of these being that the trial court erred in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict. This contention is based on the provision of section 653, Comp. Sfcat. 1921 and decisions of this court thereunder. This section reads:

“Entries in books of account may be admitted in evidence when it is made to appear by the oath of the person who made the entries that such entries are correct and were made at or near the time of the transaction to which they relate, or upon proof of the…