Mussil v. Bizal
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HALLEY, Vice Chief Justice.
Maud Mussil, plaintiff, commenced this action for' personal injuries against Jack Bizal, d/b/a Jack Bizal Plumbing & Heating Company, defendant, as a result of defendant’s truck striking her automobile in the rear at an intersection. The jury’s verdict was for the defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was overruled and she appeals.
Plaintiff’s first proposition of error is that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing defendant’s counsel to improperly cross-examine plaintiff’s witnesses. Plaintiff makes no claim in her brief that any objection by her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Lyday v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Laffoon v. KantorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Swyden v. KilliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Locke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976