Cassil v. Carter

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

This case was tried in the court below without the intervention of a jury, the parties having agreed to waive a jury and submit the issues of fact and law to the court. In the brief of defendant only two propositions are present ed and argued, which are as follows:(1) “The court erred in admitting in evidence the ledger of the plaintiff.(2) “The evidence of the plaintiff was insufficient to warrant a judgment against the defendant, R. Cassil.”

The testimony showed that plaintiff’s manner and custom in the conducting of his' merchandise business was to have all sales made…