Legal Opinion

Downing & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 3, 1925No. 2443PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Rolls of grass cloth imported at the port of New York were classified by the collector of customs as paper hangings composed of vegetable fiber and assessed for duty at 40 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1021 of the tariff act of 1922, which reads as follows :

Par. 1021. * * * manufactures of vegetable fiber other than cotton, or of which such fibers or any of them is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for, 40 per cent ad valorem.

The importer protested that the merchandise was dutiable either at 10 per cent ad valorem or at 1 cents per pound, plus 20…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Eidman v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  4. Dejonge v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. Hatters' Fur ExchangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Brummer Gallery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. United States v. Kurt Orban Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  5. Victor England Agencies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API