United States v. Kurt Orban Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWoRley, Chief Judge
The issue in this appeal by the Government is the proper classification of an importation invoiced as a “Lindemann Metal Scrap Baler, and parts.” The Customs Court sustained the importer’s protest and held it dutiable under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a machine n.s.p.f., rather than as a machine tool, as classified by the collector.
The relevant portions of the statute read:
Paragraph 372, as modified by T.D. 51802:
Machine tools (except jig-boring machine tools)_15% ad val.
♦ * * * * # *
Farts, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief value of metal or porcelain, of articles…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woolworth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. SussfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3Cited by2 opinions
- EOS of North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- General Motors Overseas Operations v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962