Legal Opinion

United States v. Kurt Orban Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 7, 1959No. 4990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoRley, Chief Judge

The issue in this appeal by the Government is the proper classification of an importation invoiced as a “Lindemann Metal Scrap Baler, and parts.” The Customs Court sustained the importer’s protest and held it dutiable under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a machine n.s.p.f., rather than as a machine tool, as classified by the collector.

The relevant portions of the statute read:

Paragraph 372, as modified by T.D. 51802:

Machine tools (except jig-boring machine tools)_15% ad val.

♦ * * * * # *

Farts, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief value of metal or porcelain, of articles…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woolworth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. SussfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  3. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. EOS of North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  2. General Motors Overseas Operations v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API