Legal Opinion

Mattoon & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 17, 1965No. C.D. 2545PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The importer by this action is seeking reclassification of certain Von Arx air guns and parts which were assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, which provides as follows:

Machine tools (except jig-boring machine tools)_15% ad val.

# * # sjs s¡« * *

Parts, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief value of metal or porcelain, of articles provided for in any item 372 of this Part:

**:];:!:***

Other- The same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woolworth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. SussfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  3. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Mattoon v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API