Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Backyard Burgers of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1996No. COA95-849PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs injury by accident, which resulted from a hazardous condition on property adjacent to his employer’s premises, arose out of and in the course of employment when defendant employer instructed him to use that route for ingress and egress. Defendants contend that the “premises” rule limits the compensability of an employee’s injuries while going to and from work to those occurring on property the employer owns, controls, or maintains. In light of a recent Supreme Court decision on this issue, we must agree.

To be compensable under…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wiley Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Royster v. Culp, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aaron v. New Fortis Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Allen v. Inco, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003
  4. Hunt v. Tender Loving Care Home Care Agency, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003
  5. Hunt v. Tender Loving Care Home Care Agency, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API