Legal Opinion

Town of Haskell v. Edmonds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 10, 1923No. 12841PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was a suit in equity commenced by the defendants in error, as a committee representing interested property owners, for the purpose of enjoining the plaintiffs in.'error from levying and collecting’ assessments against their property for the payment of certain paving improvements. ’ ■ ••

The town of Haskell is an incorporated town having a population of more than 1,000 and the paving was duly petitioned for by the property owners pursuant to chapter 176 of the acts of the Legislature of 1919, which act, including the title, is in words and figures as follows:.“An act providing for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. In Re LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. United States v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Rakowski v. Wagoner, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. State Ex Rel. Breene v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Edmonds v. Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API