Legal Opinion
Union Indemnity Co. v. Saling
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 19, 1933No. 23873PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This is an original proceeding instituted in this court to obtain a review of an order of the State Industrial Comfmission.
There are three principal questions -involved : Hirst, the constitutionality of the amendment to- section 7297, C. O. S. 1921, enacted by chapter 30, S. L. 1929, providing, in substance, for the execution of a bond as a condition precedent to instituting a proceeding in this court to review an award favorable to a claimant before the Commission. Second, the extent of the liability of the surety on such a bond. Third, the jurisdiction of the State Industrial Commission to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.