Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1930No. 19050PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This proceeding originated in the county court of Oklahoma- county, wherein was filed a complaint against John Blennett, plaintiff in error, charging him with being tbe father of a bastard child, under the provisions of article 3, eh. 70, C. O. S. 1921 (sections 8059-8069, both inclusive), entitled “Illegitimate Children.” He will be hereinafter referred to as defendant and the defendant in error will be referred to- as the state.

The defendant was placed under arrest. He entered a plea of not guilty, demanded a jury trial and was tried before a jury in the county court. Pending the trial, he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Hast v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Dickinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. FarnsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Anderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Shinn v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. State v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API