Legal Opinion

Monastra v. Konica Business MacHines, U.S.A., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1996No. B084674PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

In this case of first impression, we are called upon to determine whether compliance with the notice requirements of California’s Bulk Sales Act (Cal. U. Com. Code, § 6101 et seq.; formerly the Bulk Transfer Act) 1 insulates a bulk sale from attack under the Fraudulent Transfer Act and Civil Code section 3440, 2 even if the transfer is one of those fraudulent or constructively fraudulent transfers proscribed in the latter statutes. We answer the question in the negative.

Nicholas Monastra appeals from a summary judgment entered against him and in favor of two of the eight…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Andalon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Reddy v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  2. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cortez v. VogtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API