Andersen v. Charles
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants in an action for specific performance, after demurrer sustained to plaintiff’s amended complaint with leave to amend, but the right to amend not being exercised.
It is alleged in the amended complaint, exhibiting only so much of it as is necessary to a consideration of the points presented to us, that the contract sought to be enforced was one by which appellant agreed to buy and respondents agreed to sell certain described real property, consisting of nineteen city lots in a group, at an agreed price of twelve thousand dollars;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Klein v. MarkarianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Morrill v. EversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Windsor v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Drullinger v. ErskineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- O'Connell v. LampeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Bonney v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- George v. WestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.