Klein v. Markarian
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial. The action was for specific enforcement of an alleged contract for the conveyance of real estate, or to recover damages for the breach.
The essential facts are stated in the court’s findings, which may be summarized as follows: On November 16, 1910, Markarian, the defendant, executed a written option, whereby he offered to sell to L. W. Klein and Company a tract of land in Fresno County “for the sum of $45,000, payable at the times and upon the terms and conditions following, to wit: $11,000.00 to be paid…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Marsh v. LottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Los Angeles Immigration & Cooperative Ass'n v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Schmeling v. KrieselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Handy v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Roberts v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.