Legal Opinion
Sarkeys v. Haas
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 25, 1965No. 40627PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Defendant in error, Fielding D. Haas, referred to as plaintiff, commenced proceedings against S. J. Sarkeys, an individual, .and Sarkeys, Inc., a corporation, referred ■to as defendants, to recover attorney’s fee allegedly due him. Plaintiff’s action was predicated on the grounds that he had, at the request of defendants and each of them, commenced to perform and did perform professional services as an attorney in connection with an action pending against defendants in Dewey County, Oklahoma.
In addition to defendants’ challenge to fhe venue and jurisdiction of the Cleveland…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Independent - Eastern Torpedo Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Consolidated Fuel Co. v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Richard Hefley and Kent Martin D/B/A Agri Investment Services v. Harry JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Sloan v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Rout v. Crescent Public Works AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Peoples Bank of Aurora v. HaarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Shoemaker v. Estate of FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.