Hooven v. First Nat. Bank in Ardmore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This proceeding in error is from a judgment based on a jury’s v'erdiet in the sum of $11,368.44, interest, attorney’s fee and costs, in favor of defendant in error, plaintiff below, and against plaintiffs in error, defendants below, based upon two causes of action, 'each founded upon promissory notes executed by defendants below in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Under the first assignment of error it is contended that the trial court erred in th’e admission of summaries and tabulations made by two accountants, McCollom & Law, from the book entries of the transactions out of which the dispute…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Jordan v. Estate of WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Louisville Bridge Co. v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Fidelity Deposit Co. v. Champion Ice Mfg. & Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. British American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Suttle v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Casselman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
- Keller v. PortaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.