Joost v. Dore
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This action was brought for the purpose of obtaining a judgment setting aside and declaring void a foreclosure sale of the property involved in the action, and restoring the plaintiff to his position and rights as they existed prior to the judgment upon which such foreclosure sale was had.
The facts of the case disclosed by the record are as follows: On December 30, 1893, one Henry M. G. Dahler was the holder of the record title to certain property in San Francisco embracing a number of lots and covering about five acres, of which property he was however in fact the owner of only an undivided…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Ward v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Black v. Vermont Marble Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Wilson v. DahlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keys v. Alamo City Baseball Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Murphy v. BridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919