Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Dahler

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1908No. Civ. No. 483PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. »

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting the motion of the defendants Joost for a new trial.

Plaintiff brought an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate, executed by defendant Henry M. G. Dahler to the German Savings and Loan Society, to secure payment of a promissory note for the sum of $5,000, • dated December 30, 1893. Behrend Joost and Martin B. Joost were made parties defendant as claiming some interest in the property, which was alleged to be subsequent and subordinate to the mortgage. The mortgage and note were assigned to plaintiff before suit.

Behrend Joost and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Porter v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joost v. DoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API