Murphy v. Bridge
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree adjudging plaintiff to be the owner of the real property described in the .complaint subject only to a lien of defendant, May E. Bridge, for the unpaid balance of a certain debt. The suit is one in equity, brought by plaintiff against Arthur F. Bridge and May E. Bridge, as administrators with the will annexed of F. W. Bridge, deceased, and May E. Bridge, individually, to have it adjudged that the legal title to the property in dispute was held by F. W. Bridge in his lifetime in trust and as security for the debt of Herman Murphy, husband of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Joost v. DoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beglinger v. ShieldWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Bishop v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Green v. Rancho Santa Margarita Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994