Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Commission
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 20, 1995No. C3-94-1606PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Metropolitan Transit Commission (“MTC”), and respondent, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (“Metropolitan”), ask this court to determine the date of accrual of a no-fault insurer’s right of indemnity under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn.Stat. § 65B.41-.71 (1992). MTC appeals from a court of appeals decision holding that a no-fault insurer’s right of indemnity under Minn.Stat. § 65B.53, subd. 1 (1992) accrues when the insurer actually pays on its insured’s claim. Because we believe that the legislature did not clearly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Christy v. Menasha CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bol v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Kolton v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.