Legal Opinion

City of Bothell v. Barnhart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2011No. 84907-2PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 The city of Bothell, which encompasses portions of both King County and Snohomish County, charged James K. Barnhart in Bothell Municipal Court with stalking in the Snohomish County portion of the city. The jury, which was composed of two King County and four Snohomish County jurors, ultimately convicted Barnhart. The Court of Appeals reversed Barnhart’s conviction because the impaneling of the King County jurors, although valid under RCW 2.36.050, violated article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution. We affirm the Court of Appeals and hold that the composition of Barnhart’s jury…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CienfuegosWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HunleyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re the Detention of M.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Didlake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. In Re The Detention Of: S.e.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API