State v. Hunley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 This case requires us to decide whether a sentencing court violated a defendant’s right to due process by basing the imposed sentence on prior convictions demonstrated only by the prosecutor’s written summary and the defendant’s failure to object. The Court of Appeals held this violated the defendant’s right to due process, and we now affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Monte W. Hunley was convicted by a jury on July 13, 2009 of attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle. At sentencing, the State presented a written statement of prosecuting attorney (prosecutor summary),…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BassettWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Brown v. Department of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State Of Washington, V William Edward LundstromCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- 4518 S. 256th, LLC v. Karen L. Gibbon, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.