In Re The Detention Of: S.e.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶1 Today we must decide whether the Washington Constitution requires that a jury be seated to determine the issues presented in a probable cause hearing commenced pursuant to RCW 71.05.240, a mental illness statute. We hold that it does not. Because no jury was required and because substantial evidence supports the trial court’s findings of fact, we affirm. 1
I
¶2 S.E. was involuntarily committed to Fairfax Hospital for an initial period of evaluation and treatment due to concerns about her dangerous mental disorder. An evaluating physician from Fairfax petitioned the superior court to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. StrasburgWashington Supreme Court · 1910
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re T.c.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In Re C.b.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In Re The Detention Of J.h., State Of Wa, Resp V. J.h., AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- In Re The Detention Of K.p.-m.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- In Re The Detention Of M.s.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.